Latest Article
Distance Estimation in Ultrasound Images Using Specific Decorrelation Curves
Time:2014-1-07  
DONG Fang1, ZHANG Dong1, YANG Yan1†, YANG Yue1, QIN Qianqing2
1. School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, China
Abstract:
 Speckle decorrelation algorithm is a method using decorrelation curves to estimate the distance between two neighbor- ing ultrasound images. In this paper, we propose a new method to obtain specific decorrelation curves for distance estimation. First, several datasets of synthetic ultrasound (US) images are obtained by scanning different scatters. Second, based on the US datasets, we compute low-order moments and the elevational decorrelation curves. Finally, low-order moments are used to classify different scattering conditions. The suitable decorrelation curves can be acquired when the scattering style has been determined. With these steps, the relationship between low order moments and the decor- relation curves is established by the scattering conditions. This relationship proves to be efficient and applicable in the experiment section. The decorrelation curves chosen according to the rela- tionship also perform well in the distance estimation test. 
Key words: scattering condition; low-order moments; the decor- relation curves; distance estimation
CLC number: TP 391.41
References:
[1] Rankin R N, Fenster A, Downey D B, et al. Three- dimensional sonographic reconstruction: techniques and diagnostic applications [J]. American Journal of Roentgenology, 1993, 161(4): 695-702.  
[2] Housden R J, Gee A H, Treece G M, et al. Sub-sample interpolation strategies for sensorless freehand 3D ultrasound [J]. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 2006, 32(12): 1897- 1904. 
[3] Treece G M, Prager R W, Gee A H, et al. Correlation of probe pressure artifacts in freehand 3D ultrasound [J]. Medical Image Analysis, 2002, 6(3): 199-214. 
[4] Yeung F, Levinson S F, Parker K J. Multilevel and motion model-based ultrasonic speckle tracking algoritms [J]. Ultrasound in Medical and Biology, 1988, 24(3): 427-441.  
[5] Bohs L N, Trahey G E. A novel method for angle independent ultrasonic imaging of blood flow and tissue motion [J]. Biomedical Engineering, 1991, 38(3): 280-286. 
[6] Prager R W, Gee A H, Treece G M, et al. Sensorless freehand 3D ultrasound using regression of the echo intensity [J]. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 2003, 29(3): 437-446. 
[7] Tuthill T A, Krucher J F, Fowlkes J B, et al. Automated three-dimensional US frame positioning computed from elevational speckle decorrelation [J]. Radiology, 1988, 209(2): 575-582. 
[8] Hassenpflug P, Prager R W, Treece G M, et al. Speckle classification forsensorless freehand 3-D ultrasound [J]. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 2005, 31(11): 1499- 1508. 
[9] Gee A H, Housden R J, Hassenpflug P, et al. Sensorless freehand 3D ultrasound in real tissue: speckle decorrelation without fully developed speckle [J]. Medical Image Analysis, 2006, 10(2): 137-149. 
[10] Laporte C, Arbel T. Learning to estimate out-of-plane motion in ultrasound imagery of real tissue [J]. Medical Image Analysis, 2011, 15(2): 202-213.  
[11] Laporte C, Clark J J, Arbel T. Generalized Poisson 3D scatterer distributions [J]. Ultrasonics, 2009, 56(2): 410- 414. 
[12] Bartholdi Ⅲ J J, Goldsman P. Vertex-labeling algorithms for the Hilbert spacefilling curve [J]. Software: Practice and Experience, 2001, 32(5): 395-408.
[13] Svoboda D, Kozubek M, Stejskal S. Generation of digital phantoms of cell nuclei and simulation of image formation in 3D image cytometry [J]. Cytometry Part A, 2009, 75A (6): 494-509. 
[14] Jensen J A. Field: A program for simulating ultrasound systems [J]. Medical and Biology Engineering and Computing, 1997, 4(1): 351-353. 
[15] Prager R W, Gee A H, Treece G M, et al. Speckle detection in ultrasound images using first order statistics [R]. Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy, 2001. 
[16] Khan M. 3D Reconstruction of Ultrasound Images [D]. Dijon: University of Burgundy, 2008. 
[17] Cramblitt R M, Parker K J. Generation of non-rayleigh speckle distributions using marked regularity models [J]. Ultrasonics, 1999, 46(4): 867-874.