Latest Article
Folding Kinetics of HDV Ribozyme with C13A:G82U and A16U:U79A Mutations
Time:2015-11-27  
ZOU Yanjuan, WANG Yujie, GONG Sha,
School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, China
Abstract:
Gene mutations influence the folding kinetics of hepatitis delta virus (HDV) ribozyme. In this work, we study the effect of the double mutation on the folding kinetics of HDV ribozyme. By using the master equation method combined with RNA folding free energy landscape, we predict the folding kinetics of C13A:G82U and A16U:U79A mutated HDV sequences. Their folding pathways are identified by recursively searching the states with high net flux-in(out) population starting from the native state. The results indicate that the folding kinetics of C13A:G82U muta-tion sequence is bi-phasic, which is similar to the wild type (wtHDV) sequence. While the folding kinetics of A16U:U79A mutation sequence is mono-phasic, it quickly folds to the native state in 30 s. Thus, the folding kinetics of double mutated HDV ribozyme depends on the mutation sites.
Key words:hepatitis delta virus (HDV) ribozyme; master equation method; folding kinetics; recursive search
CLC number:O 469; Q 61
References:
[1]	Alvarado-Mora M V, Locarnini S, Rizzetto M, et al. An update on HDV: Virology, pathogenesis and treatment [J]. Antiviral Therapy, 2013, 18(3): 541-548.
[2]	Rizzetto M, Canese M G, Ariò S, et al. Immunofluorescence detection of new antigen-antibody system (δ/anti-δ) asso- ciated to hepatitis B virus in liver and in serum of HBsAg carriers [J]. Gut, 1977, 18(2): 997-1003.
[3]	Noureddin M, Gish R. Hepatitis delta: Epidemiology, diagnosis and management 36 years after discovery [J]. Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 2014, 16(1): 365.
[4]	Kapral G J, Jain S, Doudna J A, et al. New tools provide a second look at HDV ribozyme structure, dynamics and cleavage [J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2014, 42(20): 12833- 12846.
[5]	Perrotta A T, Been M D. A pseudoknot-like structure required for efficient self-cleavage of hepatitis delta virus RNA [J]. Nature, 1991, 350(6317): 434-436.
[6]	Perrotta A T, Been M D. The self-cleaving domain from the genomic RNA of hepatitis delta virus: sequence require- ments and the effects of denaturant [J]. Nucl Acids Res, 1990, 18(23): 6821-6827.
[7]	Chadalavada D M, Cerrone-szakal A L, Bevilacqua P C. Wild-type is the optimal sequence of the HDV ribozyme under cotranscriptional conditions [J]. RNA, 2007, 13(12): 2189-2201.
[8]	Chadalavada D M, Senchak S E, Bevilacqua P C. The folding pathway of the genomic hepatitis delta virus ribozyme is dominated by slow folding of the pseudoknots [J]. Journal of Molecular Biology, 2002, 317(4): 559-575.
[9]	Thaplyal P, Ganguly A, Hammes-Schiffer S, et al. Inverse thio effects in the hepatitis delta virus ribozyme reveal that the reaction pathway is controlled by metal ion charge density [J]. Biochemistry, 2015, 54(12): 2160-2175.
[10]	Been M, Perrotta A, Rosenstein S. Secondary structure of the self-cleaving RNA of hepatitis delta virus: applications to catalytic RNA design [J]. Biochemistry, 1992, 31(47): 11843-11852.
[11]	Wu H N, Lee J Y, Huang H W, et al. Mutagenesis analysis of ribozyme a hepatitis delta virus genomic [J]. Nucl Acids Res, 1993, 21(18): 4193-4199.
[12]	Tanner N K, Schaff S, Thill G, et al. A three-dimensional model of hepatitis delta virus ribozyme based on biochemical and mutational analyses [J]. Curr Biol, 1994, 4(6): 488-498.
[13]	Kumar P K, Suhl Y A, Miyashiro H, et al. Random mutations to evaluate the role of bases at two important single-stranded regions of genomic HDV ribozyme [J]. Nucl Acids Res, 1992, 20(15): 3919-3924.
[14]	Chen J W, Gong S, Wang Y J, et al. Kinetic partitioning mechanism of HDV ribozyme folding [J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2014, 140(2): 025102.
[15]	Zhao P N, Zhang W B, Chen S J. Predicting secondary structural folding kinetics for nucleic acids [J]. Biophysical Journal, 2010, 98(8): 1617-1625. 
[16]	Zhang W B, Chen S. Master equation approach to finding the rate-limiting steps in biopolymer folding [J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2003, 118(7): 3413-3420. 
[17]	Zhao P N, Zhang W B, Chen S J. Cotranscriptional folding kinetics of ribonucleic acid secondary structures [J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2011, 135(24): 245101. 
[18]	Mathews D H, Sabina J, Zuker M, et al. Expanded sequence dependence of thermodynamic parameters improves prediction of RNA secondary structure [J]. Journal of Molecular Biology, 1999, 288(5): 911-940.
[19]	Xia T, Santalucia J, Burkard M E, et al. Thermodynamic parameters for an expanded nearest-neighbor model for formation of RNA duplexes with watson-crick base pairs [J]. Biochemistry, 1998, 37(42): 14719-14735.
[20]	Rivas E, Eddy S R. A dynamic programming algorithm for RNA structure prediction including pseudoknots [J]. Journal of Molecular Biology, 1999, 285(5): 2053-2068.
[21]	Rietveld K, Bosch L, Pleij C. A new principle of RNA folding based on pseudoknotting [J]. Nucl Acids Res, 1985, 13(5): 1717-1731.
[22]	Dam E, Pleij K, Draper D. Structural and functional aspects of RNA pseudoknots [J]. Biochemistry, 1992, 31(47): 11665- 11675.
[23]	Zhang W B, Chen S J. Exploring the complex folding kinetics of RNA hairpins: I. General folding kinetics analysis [J]. Biophysical Journal, 2006, 90(3): 765-777.
[24]	Zhang W B, Chen S J. Exploring the complex folding kinetics of RNA hairpins: II. Effect of sequence, length, and misfolded states [J]. Biophysical Journal, 2006, 90(3): 778-787.
[25]	Tan Z J, Chen S J. Salt contribution to RNA tertiary structure folding stability [J]. Biophysical Journal, 2011, 101(1): 176-187.
[26]	Tan Z J, Chen S J. Predicting ion binding properties for RNA tertiary structures [J]. Biophysical Journal, 2010, 99(5): 1565-1576.